Archive for Biblical Thinking

A Philosophy of Education

aphilosophy.jpgAs I’m currently looking for additional teaching opportunities on the collegiate and graduate level, several school have required that I submit a one-page philosophy of education.  Sometimes I think that few people involved in their area of vocational pursuit — even ministry — have taken the time to consider the philosophy behind doing what they do.  Philosophy precedes process and process precedes product, so I think that developing a sound philosophy should be a priority for all of life’s pursuits from marriage to family to work to recreation to entertainment and more.

With that in mind, I’m going to post my (extremely) brief philosophy of education that I’ve been submitting to the Christian universities and colleges with which I’ve been dialoguing.  It is certainly not exhaustive, but it a condensed precis of my larger view of the underpinnings of the educational process.

—————


A proper philosophy of education begins with an acknowledgment that Truth exists and education is the process whereby we uncover Truth.  Gaebelein noted that, “all truth is God’s truth.”  The professional educator with a Biblical worldview should see Truth as the source, object and goal of the educational process.  The teacher is the guide between the student and Truth and pedagogy is the conduit that the professional educator uses to connect the student to Truth.

A Biblical philosophy of education should be holistic and should encompass the head, heart and hands.  Whether dealing with the psychomotor, cognitive or affective domains, the teacher must challenge the student – through pedagogy, curriculum, methodology, philosophy and application – to consider the Source, the consequences and the potential of Truth across the academic disciplines.  A sound curriculum exalts God in that His character and nature are revealed in Creation and knowledge.  Indeed, the “fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge” and our life meets God’s plan and purpose for His creation when we “acknowledge Him in all our ways.”  It is not enough to teach students what they should know or even how to use educational objectives and truths, but they should be instructed to use them in ways that glorify the Author and fulfills His plans for their lives.

Even in a secular or public arena, a philosophy of education based on a core belief that there is a God and that He matters (absolute Truth) will change the dynamics of how a curriculum is approached without having to be overtly parochial.  Indeed, instruction offered by an instructor with a Biblical worldview will note the attributes of order, purpose, design and affect that all lead to the conclusion that “chance” is an insufficient explanation for what we observe in and know about creation.

Every facet of education, should be driven by sound philosophy and encompasses the spectrum from curriculum to pedagogy to discipline to communication to evaluation and more.  What one accepts as Truth will determine one’s philosophy.  Philosophy drives principle.  Principle leads to application.  Application influences behavior.  Thus outcomes and Truth are intrinsically interconnected.  Behavior is reflective of our beliefs.

A Biblical view of education requires more than a good curriculum or even noble objectives.  It demands a fundamental commitment to and knowledge of the Word of God as the foundation for all that the educator seeks to accomplish.

Comments

Wheaton College continues to Trek Left

A few times over the years, I’ve spoken or blogged about my concern that one of America’s most “prestigious” (arguable) and “historic” (inarguable) evangelical schools of higher learning was shifting so far to the left that it would eventually join the annals of fine schools that became apostate with the passage of time.  Schools like Harvard and Yale were once intended to train students for ministry and to have a Biblical worldview.  More modern examples might include Baylor and Davidson.  None of these examples would fit within the mold of even a moderately Biblical institution of higher learning at this time.

So when I saw THIS article, I was saddened to see that the suspicions of folks like me are now being codified and supported by empirical evidence.  Wheaton has a new president.  We can only hope that he responds to this drift with the strength and focus of an Al Mohler or Paige Patterson.  Few colleges have been able to reverse a dive toward liberalism and modernism — most success stories are found in the ranks of seminaries.

Take a look at the article HERE and stay informed as to the battle that is going on across America for the philosophy and worldview of the next generation.

Comments (6)

Chasing Fool’s Gold

The man who adopted my great-great grandfather, Judge Orlando Burrell of Carmi, Illinois had a colorful life.  He was a US congressman, a colonel in the Union Army during the Civil War, he was a judge and a mayor.  He made his “fortune” during the California Gold Rush which provided him with the resources to chase other dreams that he had and gave him influence and opportunities as well.  He was an exception to those who ran West during the height of the great Gold Rush.

foolsgold.jpgThousands of people uprooted their families and moved to California in search of quick riches.  Some fully expected to find chunks of gold sitting on river bottoms ready to be loaded up and turned into an instant fortune.  Others picked up rocks flecked with gold only to discover that what they had was of no value and instead was what would be called “fool’s gold”.  Whether chasing for gold that they never quite found or picking up the illusion of gold to find it worthless, many found nothing but disappointment, emptiness and shattered dreams.

Today, in many ways, we haven’t progressed much past that kind of thinking.  Take a look at the typical advertising campaign.  How many times do we buy one brand of soda over another because of the catchy sales jingle?  Sometimes, the more fantastic the claim, the better we like the “experience”.  Seriously, does drinking your favorite fruit punch make a tropical island surrounded by swaying palms and girls in hula skirts suddenly appear?  If you purchase new glasses, will you look as cool as the guy with the spiked and highlighted hair and the chiseled body who is seen in the magazine ad?  Does any single woman on the planet really believe that the only way to get the man of her dreams is to wear “Maybelline?”  Of course not, but that really isn’t the issue.  We KNOW the commercials and actors and manufacturers are LYING to us and frankly, we don’t care!  We enjoy indulging in our little fantasy that we can buy or paint or clothe ourselves to youth, sexiness, success and ultimately, happiness.  What does it really hurt?

Glen Ward wrote a book a few years ago entitled, “Postmodernism“.  In it he wrote, “The increasing invasion of signs and images (in media, display, advertising and so on) into the fabric of everyday life has created a dream world ideal lifestylesabercrombie-and-fitch.jpg for us to fantasize about and identify with.  For example, many commercials are more concerned with attaching a sense of lifestyle and experience to the product being sold than to giving details about the product itself.  (One only needs to look at ads for Abercrombie and Fitch to realize they are selling sex, not clothing and in doing so are one of the top retailers to the young and hip. — DB) Because of this, we get as much satisfaction from consuming the images attached to goods as we do from whatever practical function the goods might serve.”

An old friend of mine, Pastor Rick Shrader who pastored a church in Colorado for many years once wrote in a little paper he produced called “Aletheia” that we have become so used to this form of communication in our lives that we fully expect to be lied to.  He went on to warn against the movement within churches to jump on the “experience” bandwagon.  He noted that sincerity has become of greater worth than reality.  Experience and emotion are to be coveted above accuracy and fact.

elevate-logo-descrip.jpgIn other words, people are more interested in feelings than facts.  They want to “experience” a spiritual feeling even if that feeling comes at the expense of neglecting orthodox and doctrinal instruction.  We are more desirous of affirmation and inspiration than challenging information.  We want a God that makes us feel better about us more than we want a God Who helps us to see us for who we really are and what we genuinely need.

Thus, our churches spend great energy and resources on creating an experience in “worship” rather than the presentation of the “Word.”  Doctrine is downplayed as divisive, boring and even transitional.  What matters is the pragmatic effect of shared experiences, emotional movement and a sloppy form of self-affirmation that emphasizes style and sincerity and a nebulous form of spirituality.  In this world, Oprah is as much a spiritual leader as Billy Graham; Joel Osteen and Robert Schuller outshine more studious prophets as John MacArthur or Warren Wiersbe.

There is a danger in a cold orthodoxy that never touches the heart.  We can’t be so afraid of emotion and compassion and scripture_closeup_0preview.jpgexpression that it make our faith impotent or simply a matter of intellectual assent.  The practical effect of the gospel is a changed life, rearranged priorities and a passion for the things of God demonstrated in daily living.  But one has to wonder if the typical Western church today spends as much time in exegeting the Word as it does in creating an “atmosphere”.  Does the average preacher plan the feel of the service with as great precision as he studies the content and context of the Gospel he preaches?  Have we sacrificed our sound doctrine for a social activism which leaves us with a false sense of accomplishment that lasts only as long as the adrenaline rush of self-congratulatory emotion that follows a pseudo-spiritual exercise?

I don’t believe it necessarily has to be either/or and those who argue such are guilty, in my mind, of a false dichotomy.  At the same time, much of what I disdain about the modern church movement today (which includes the CGM, Emergents, etc…) is that we get far more worked up about feeding the homeless than we do preaching the Gospel.  At the same time, I fully recognize that one of the sins of our past was our willingness to step over the bodies of those who were starving in order to preach a message on compassion.

We must pause and remember that the moral relativist and the post-modernist believes that truth is a product of experience.  Therefore they put great value on image, stories, self-interpreting histories, drama, sensory experiences, narratives and even illusion.  One write notes that, “We are in a logic of simulation which has nothing to do with a logic of facts and an order of reasons.”

I’m afraid that by now I may have lost some of you in this philosophical monologue.  But I want to you consider how our culture gets caught up in experiences and emotions -from the way we exalt athletics, to the ads we will have pummel us as Christmas approaches, to what passes as worship these days in a typical evangelical church.  Even we as believers tend to get swept up in catastrophe or tragedy and almost become paralyzed in an irrational frenzy of grief or morbid curiosity such as when a celebrity dies like Princess Diana, Michael Jackson or Anna Nicole Smith.

I personally question if our electorate would ever again choose a seasoned old statesman over a thin, vibrant, good-looking-but-untested political newcomer.  What was it that compelled so many conservatives, evangelicals and faith/values voters to vote for a President who promised to stand against the values so many of them claimed to hold dear — like smaller government, pro-life, traditional family values, etc… — simply because he was more attractive and eloquent and charismatic?  And why are they so shocked now that he is keeping those very promises as they wake up to the reality that we have a man in the White House who is committed to an extreme liberal agenda more so than any President in American history?  Why is that Kanye West and Taylor Swift are followed more enthusiastically than the nine men and women who interpret our very constitution?

It’s time we ask ourselves if we are chasing fool’s gold.  In our personal lives, our homes, our businesses and yes…. in our churches.  Today’s evangelical believer is more offended by someone who speaks with authoritative passion and a sense of absolute truth than they are about the carnal and sensual messages of today’s entertainment industry.  As a result, our churches are filled with “show”, our sermons are filled with “fluff” and our hearts are filled with “darkness.”

Believers must be careful to search for truth.  Preachers must be careful to preach the Word.  And all of us must take care to keep from chasing “fool’s gold”.

Comments (9)

To Those Who Teach or Administrate in Christian Schools

The issues of “rules” in a Christian day school setting have been discussed for many years.  Now with a full generation or more of “products” since the great explosion of evangelical Christian day schools hit our country in the 70’s and 80’s, many are being forced to admit that most of us would not want to attend the reunions of our graduating classes as we’d feel horrifically out of place.  In other words, the “rules” really didn’t make that much of a difference.

Mike Durning has written a thought-provoking article for those who still think that “rules” and “standards” help produce good Christians.  When I first began raising similar questions nearly twenty years ago, I was considered a renegade and a “liberal”.  Mike does a great job of making his case and if you are part of a school that seems to be “rules-oriented”, may I suggest you read his essay and follow the ones that will be released over the next few days.

You can find it HERE.

Comments (10)

Some Principles of Christian Thinking

Each week, I try to send the faculty of Dade Christian School and The Master’s Academy a few paragraphs on how a Biblical World View impacts life and the classroom.  I thought I’d start sharing some of these with you….

————-

Principles of Christian Thinking

1.    “Ultimate Reality”  (those things that are really real) exists first and best in the personal, sovereign, Triune God.

The Christian begins and ends his view of the World with the basic concept that there is a God and He matters.  In fact, He is the “ultimate reality” – the ONE THING in this universe that is “really real.”  The great thing about Him is that He isn’t just a “force” or a “spirit” or a “mass”.  He is personal.  He has the attributes we see in ourselves like creativity, He knows He exists, He designs, etc…, but He’s so much more.  He is Sovereign – meaning He has ALL power.  He is Triune – in that He has three distinct parts (Father, Son, Holy Spirit) which are each unique and each are fully God.

2.    Absolute (as in unchanging and always) truth comes to man in the form of God’s self-initiated, inerrant revelation, the Bible.

God has purposefully revealed what He wants us to know about Him and His creation through Creation and through the Word of God (the Bible and Jesus Christ.)  If we want to know more about Him, we study all that we experience through the paradigm that  His Word provides for us.

3.    The nature of human beings is declared to be in His image, but because of sin, we have fallen and are marred – no longer perfect – and in need of redemption and restoration which is made possible by the death and resurrection of Christ.

Perfect we once were, but we are perfect no more.  We are marred/flawed creations because of sin.  But through Christ, we have hope of complete and total restoration.

4.    Values are not determined by society or majority vote, but is ascertained as a part of God’s revelation.

God has give us the ability to know Him and as we know Him, we adopt His values.  We can discern between right and wrong.  We have the innate ability to make decisions between good and evil and better and best.  These values are not ours to form on our own, but ours to discover as we study the Word of God and know more about God.

5.    The meaning of history centers in the plan and power of God.

History is truly “His Story” in that it is how we record and discern how God is exercising His will on His creation.  All of human history is the story of God and it is still being revealed to us each day.

6.    The Biblical World View opposes a system of unbelief (worldly thinking) that stands in contrast to the principles of Scripture.

Fundamentally, there are only two world-views.  Either God is real and His Word is Truth or God is not real and His Word doesn’t matter.  If there is no God, then values, morals, ethics, philosophy and truth are all relevant and are at the whim of the coincidental natural biology that has caused man to crawl out of the primordial soup.  It’s really quite basic – Either God is Truth or God is a liar.

7.    Christian leadership in every form requires disciplined thinking based on absolute Truth.

We are accountable for how we think and what we do with Truth.  As the philosopher Socrates said, “The unexamined life is not worth living.”  We have been given Truth and we need to examine our life in light of that Truth.  We will someday be held accountable for what we have accepted as Truth and what we did with Truth.

Comments (10)